• THE GREATER THE DISTANCE.
THE FASTER YOU MOVE THROUGH SPACE
THE SLOWER YOU MOVE THROUGH TIME
INFORMATION ENTERING.
BLACK HOLES ARE LOST FOREVER
    • EmailPinterestRedditTumblr Report
    • Copy link
    • Pinterest
  • 2156 comments

    • Quick, throw the new Star Wars trilogy into a black hole.
      958 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • That’s not what E=MC^2 means
      748 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • E=MC^Vagina
      592 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Gauss’s theory’s are more useful
      541 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • S = KLOGW Seems to be going as planned
      459 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • First one is just straight up wrong. The equivalency is between mass and energy, so the more mass you have, the more energy you have.
      363 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Does that mean if I throw the lord of the rings into a black hole the story no longer exists?
      360 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Oh no! E=MC^2 seems to be defined incorrectly! The experts in the IFunny comment section sure won’t like this....
      221 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • zerosober 25 jun
      194 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Unpopular opinion: Math is actually fun if you’re good at it
      Autissimo 25 jun
      139 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • These explanations are misleading or incomplete. Reply if you want me to explain one in depth. I'm a physics major
      6122 25 jun
      39 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Energy = Mass X The acceleration of light^2 .............. This doesn't mean the faster you go the heavier you are. It means there is a shit ton of energy in matter.
      25 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Why the fuck is this featured
      Tterbo 25 jun
      23 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • 8=D the harder the cock the heavier the balls
      Jimbus 25 jun
      18 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Coulomb: “Can I see your answers?” Newton: “Yeah just change it up a little so it doesn’t look like you copied”
      willgnyc 25 jun
      14 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Physics is badass
      13 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • What a terrible misinterpretation to start off with. Gravitational mass (heaviness) is not impacted by an increase in translational kinetic energy, only relativistic mass is.
      Curvz 25 jun
      14 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • That is not what E=MC^2 means. That formula is a way of telling how much energy it takes to create a certain amount of mass. It has nothing to do with the speed you’re moving. Using the formula 1 kg of any material would take 9x10^16 Joules to create. So this graphic is just blatantly wrong.
      13 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • So you're saying I can throw TLOU2 in there and it be wiped from existence?
      Truck_kun 25 jun
      14 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Whatever doesn’t matter... has no mass
      DrZwicky 25 jun
      11 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • When a black lady called you: C6h12o6
      2rawwww 25 jun
      9 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Question guys. Is what happenned in the movie Interstellar , when matthew mcaughnahey came back younger than his daughter, theoretically possible?
      SirWoodie 25 jun
      10 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • No, the first one is the energy required to move the mass at the speed of light.
      Pnslayer 25 jun
      11 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • half of these are wrong lmao
      caramel 27 jun
      9 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • You butchered my boi boltzmann. You didn’t even say the word “entropy.”
      8 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Damn! Your mother is fast!
      Sensino 25 jun
      8 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • It's beautiful how the gravitation equation and the electromagnetism equation parallel eachother so closely
      8 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Me = No Dad | The more fatherless I am, the more successful I shall be
      seqeul 26 jun
      8 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Isn’t it E=(MC^2)^2? E=MC^2 is a simplified version if I remember correctly
      IQtheNair 26 jun
      9 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Wait so using the 3rd one, do astronauts have higher lifespans? Even if just my a small amount? Or am I misinterpreting the meaning of time in this case.
      7 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • As a physics major.. holy shit this is not how you explain those equations
      8 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • ozgun 27 jun
      6 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Asshole = pussy - penis^2
      LTCM 25 jun
      7 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • The faster you move the heavier you get? That's not what that equation describes.
      Cacaonut 25 jun
      7 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • People really look at the law of entropy and still believe there isn’t a God lol
      77 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Flat earthers be like: hurr hurr those are some cute drawings.
      6 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • First one is a mass/energy relationship, it’d take a little more for speed
      6 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Use E=MC^2 as an excuse to not jog...
      rayAplay 26 jun
      5 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Saying entropy is “going to chaos” is incredibly misleading. Humans boost entropy as we build amazing structures and ourselves. A gravel road stays flat as it has a greater tendency to do so (as apposed to forming spikes towers of rocks randomly), yet thats its orderly purpose.
      5 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • i’m kinda dumb but for e=mc^2 it says the faster you move the heavier you get but what about light? wouldn’t that mean light would be incredibly heavy?
      kletz 25 jun
      5 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • The second one proves that LDRs don't work
      5 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Which one is for your mom?
      5 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Wasn't the black hole information thing disproven by Hawking?
      quog 25 jun
      7 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • theory of relativity has nothing to do with increasing your mass. I see how it could be used to show increased energy makes you have more mass, but c^2 is the speed of light squared so even mathematically what was said makes no fucking sense because its be E/C^2=M basically making the energy divide
      6 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • s k l o g
      4 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • I always found this Interring that the entropy term, S, (S=KLogW in this instance) is fundamentally interchangeable with time. It’s why time moves (and stretches) only forwards but not backwards.
      Foss_ 26 jun
      4 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Is it just me, or do I have no clue in the slightest about what this is going on about?
      4 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • The second to last one is proven by 2020
      4 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Uh.."information that enters a black hole is lost forever" is definitely debatable. Particularly because it violates qt. Hawking radiation is one theory as to how information can be released from the black hole, leaving information conservation intact
      4 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • I fucking hate entropy being described as chaos.
      4 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Mass has nothing to do with your weight.
      4 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • These equations are 1. mass-energy equivalence, 2. universal law of gravitation, 3. time dilation, 4. ???????, 5. Definition of Boltzmann entropy, 6. Coulomb’s law. They don’t really have anything to do with each other and appear to be a random subset of physics equations
      5 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Sklogw is a great word
      4 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Okay but how do I change the color of my campfire
      MrMemeses 26 jun
      3 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Shut up nerd
      3 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • haha yes this meme on ifunny the app where we post memes is so hilarious i am laughing so hard. the fact that this was featured tells you the state this app is in
      6 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • I think we should rename entropy to Sklogw.
      3 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Sklogw.
      3 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Already the first one is "wrong", didn't bother w the rest
      iThrasher 25 jun
      5 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • 3 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • How the fuck are philosophical theories mathematical equations
      Otakezt 25 jun
      3 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • This doesn't help me if the letters don't make any sense
      2 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • The descriptions on these formulas are inaccurate and it's pissing me off.
      bob2boy 25 jun
      4 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Half of these sentences don’t even go with the equations given
      Physika 25 jun
      2 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • We are definitely as sklogw this year.
      2 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • That is not what E=mc2 means.
      2 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Bitches =\= shit
      2 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Jewel 25 jun
      4 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • The more I look= the less I care.
      TrevC 25 jun
      3 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • So im not fat I’m fast
      chaunty 25 jun
      2 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Fun Fact: E=Mc2 was actually created by Einstein in his heyday. Anyways, you just lost The Game
      2 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Imformation cannot be created nor destroyed, so the one that says imformation is lost in black holes not really correct. The information is not lost but imprinted on the surface then radiated away through Hawking radiation.
      3 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Fat people move really fast then
      1 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • SklogW
      1 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Can they split the Beer atom😎🍺🍻
      1 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Not quite. Close, but no.
      1 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • S = KLOGW. I like physics and everything but don’t actually study it so forgive me if this is a stupid question but, what about the entropy of the universe?
      Slurg 25 jun
      1 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Whoever wrote the dumb ass explanations below each formula is a fucking dumbass with no physics knowledge
      1 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • I miss physics. Minored in it, wish I majored
      1 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • The equation for entropy, while true is completely useless in any macro concept, the much more appropriate identity would be dS = dQ/T
      rorkor 25 jun
      1 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Sklogw dont care
      M4sK 25 jun
      1 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Last equation is the magnitude of force calculated by two charges. It has nothing to do with opposite charges attracting. There is no direction or anything in the formula given. In other words: cringe.
      pman9243 25 jun
      1 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • What the fuck do all these letters represent!?
      Bboy4life 25 jun
      1 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • In my physics class my teacher told me that the gravity formula isnt actually accurate as it doesnt really work at either massive scales, aka why we think there is some "dark matter", or the small scale which scientist try to attribute to "virtual particals affecting the results.
      2 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • E=mc^2 describes mass energy equivalence. While the statement they say is true, it is NOT what E=mc^2 is describing
      Enneagram 25 jun
      1 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Fun fact about the second to last one is sometimes it randomly reorders itself momentarily before re disordering itself
      KingCirce 25 jun
      1 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Wow, I have a Russian friend named S=klogw too.
      JScallz 25 jun
      1 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • 1 is actually wrong. It states that the amount of energy you have stored is equal to your mass times the universal speed constant.
      Cum_man1 25 jun
      2 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • E=MC^2 is not actually the equation it’s E=sqrt(m^2c^4 + p^2c^2)
      1 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • E=mc^2 does not prove the faster you move the heavier you get lol
      PTSDragon 25 jun
      1 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • There is loads of speculation and debate about the loss of information in a black hole. I personally subscribe to the theory that information cannot be lost, and must be expelled at some point during the lifespan of a black hole, possibly in the form of (or alongside) hawking radiation.
      1 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Show me gauss' law. If I had a dollar for every time I heard that name in my physics undergrad, I wouldn't need the degree or the jobs it may get me.
      1 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • All of these equations seem like they could be used in all my relationships.
      Dabbler 25 jun
      1 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • I'm too tired to explain well what the equations mean. Most of them are kind of correct. E=mc^2 does not say the faster you go the heavier you get. It's an eq that relates energy to mass. Relativistic mass would relate velocity to mass. The charge force eq says the same thing the gravity eq does
      1 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Y’all look up the information paradox that shits wild
      YeetTown 25 jun
      1 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • I still think the way people talk about entropy is stupid. It almost never mentions probability
      Porx 25 jun
      1 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • E=mc^2+1/(v-c)^2. Now the faster you move, the heavier you get. The first one is only accurate for small values of v and means that mass and energy are directly linked.
      1 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Cool to see the breaking bad font for science formulae. Or is this Game of Thrones font. I don't know
      1 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • So usain bolt runs to prolong his death?
      VetoPete 25 jun
      1 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • ThalajDaWuffV2 imagine the force of attraction once we're in the same room~
      trex20 25 jun
      2 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show

iFunny plug-in will teach your phone to smile

get on the iFunny app to roast them

All content related issues will be solved right here.
After all necessary information is provided, of course:

Complete the form below to notify iFunny of a claim relating to your intellectual property rights and content or some technical inconvenience with the service.
(Positive and productive feedback is appreciated as well).

Your details

Your relationships to the rights holder

Type of claim

Select
Copyright Trademark Nazi-related Offensive Technical difficulties Other
Describe the issue in detail. Please be specific.
Feeling poetic today? Feel free to provide more information
By clicking on "Submit" below, you are certifying the following statements:
  • I state that I have a good faith belief that use of the work(s) in the manner complained of is not authorized by the copyright owner, its agent, or the law.
  • I state that the information in this notification is accurate and, under penalty of perjury, that I am the owner of the exclusive right that is allegedly infringed, or an authorized agent for the owner.
  • I give my permission to pass my contact information to the alleged infringing party.

Privacy notice

For a list of the categories of personal information that we collect from you and how we use that information, please review iFunny’s privacy policy