O Anonymous (ID: Do+gctuv 3 01/15/18(Mon)21:54:21 No.156861490 >>156858257
N= number of stated partners.
H= hotness score, between 0 and 10
= tattoos and piercings number
M= makeup layers
E = extra partner multiplier. Needs to be fine-tuned with empirical research
Duplicity constant, adjust based on how duplicitous you think your girftiend is, from 1 to 10 (Hint: the less duplicitous she seems, the more duplicitous she actually is,
which is why its an inversion. So if you think your gifriend is an angel 1/10
this means she is extremely duplicitous, and therefore the extra partner multiplier will be
treated like so: E
So if you're girfiend is 23, an 8/10, wears 2 layers of makeup, has two piercings and 1 tattoo, and says that she slept with 2 guys, and you think she's kind of liar (5/10 on
duplicitousness score), and assuming an extra partner multiplier of 10:
Some researchers have pointed out that tattoos and piercings are weighted too lowly, and I would have to agree. Others point to the linearity ofthe treatment of
duplicitousness and of all other traits. Indeed, a sigmoid or perhaps empirically divined probabilistic distribution may be of more help. But without data at our disposal, we
must rely on such rough treatments.
In any case, consider this number a lower bound