• {{ formattedCount }}  {{ count > 1 ? 'comments' : 'comment' }}

    • Forcing shit like this only turns people into criminals instead of solving real problems
      GodArc 17 sep
      3.4K Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • It’s not a law if it goes against the constitution. I have every right to not give the government my guns
      732 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • We wouldn't be law abiding at that point. The law would become nothing more than a tool to subjugate people
      Luty 16 sep
      1.2K Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Who said anything about law abiding?
      600 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Laws against fire arms are infringements. I am a constitution abiding gun owner.
      320 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • *laughs in descendant of the founding texas members * come and get it
      220 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Only eligible for hanging imo
      68 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • I bought a black powder .44 because I wanna be wild Bill hikok when the boog hits
      10 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • The law I abide to is the Constitution
      795 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • The constitution can be changed.
      32 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Do people forget that you can amend the constitution, they could take away the second amendment and that literally would be the law. Like I hope you guys know that 435 house members and 100 senate members is all that’s protecting your precious 2nd amendment
      6 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • I hope the US realizes that if they try and take our guns there will be another civil war, except it would just be the people against the government pretty much
      1.2K Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • A lot of us took the oath to uphold and defend the constitution from enemies foreign and domestic. Once again, come and take it bitch
      474 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Well he is right in the purely technical sense, however if you don't see the new law as being truly lawful then you aren't breaking a law, it's all about perception. Also laws and constitutions are always being changed, that's what amendments are, to change it again isn't unconstitutional because
      Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • What part of "Shall not be infringed" don't you idiots understand?
      34 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Gun ownership is actually an inalienable right set forth in the constitution, meaning that shy of an absolute constitutional amendment (or amendment repeal) citizens of the U.S. are within their rights to own/carry firearms. If the government tries to violate or ignore that right, they are [pt. 1/2]
      1 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • And what if an ammendment were ratified that repealed the second ammendment? That would be constitutional. I'm a gun owner, but I would turn in my 2 rifles if that happened because it would be the fucking law
      9 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • M1A2C 21h
      1 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • 37 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • They’re campaigning to pass laws so they wouldn’t take your stuff until it’s passed and stfu cause the constitution doesn’t guarantee you unrestricted access to arms.
      3 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • 22 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • If the government attempted to take your legally owned gun, then they would no longer be Law abiding
      33 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Never forget that the American Revolution was technically illegal.
      4 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Who would have guessed making more things illegal makes more criminals. The same as making less things illegal makes less criminals. 🤯
      5 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Can we all agree if it ever comes to the point where they try to take away our fire arms we will start the revolution?
      1 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • New rule game end every politician
      1 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Wait wait wait- you realize there are 27 constitutional amendments, right? We’ve been changing the constitution constantly bruh
      5 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Just because it’s the law doesnt make it right. Segregation and slavery were laws but were never okay, but i guess the slave owners were just exercising their rights
      7 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Then the right to gun ownership shall not be infringed. If you’re a part of a well regulated militia. Anyone else is subject to restriction. Hence why you can’t own a tank. Or a nuke. Or a Gatling gun. You’re not a state militia. You’re a scared homeowner in the south.
      3 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Please understand that out constitutional right to own guns should not be removed. Yet, the problem arises that this was made back when a well trained man could reload a gun in less than a minute then fire one round. This is a law, but we cannot let others run rampant. Restrictions not bans!
      4 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Constitution is amenable nerd
      3 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Its even "come and take it" we shouldn't sugar coat it like that its "I will spend every breath until I die doing everything I can to k1II the people violating our constitution and my only regret will be that I have but one life to give for my country"
      10 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • This is the dumbest fucking anti gun argument I've ever seen, and that's a hard accomplishment.
      8 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • The law doesn’t make something IMPOSSIBLE. Schools are gun-free zones, you see the signs fucking everywhere. But that will not stop someone waltzing in with one if they really want to. Laws are a deterrent, not a barrier. Declare guns illegal and you won’t change the number of gun owners.
      7 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • 5 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • New rule- if you didn’t start this fucking country, don’t be setting “rules” for me and US folk about owning a gun. We have that exact right in case of corruption in this government to protect our selves. The founding fathers made it that way because of the stunt Britain pulled.
      8 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Don't think you libtards can win, a crossbow is just as effective
      3 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Laws that violate the constitution are not really laws and therefore disobeying them is not breaking the law
      7 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • I disagree with both of these guys. The second amendment is important and if it is taken away we will secede. Also it is a politician's job to make America a better place and if they believe that banning guns will do that then they should campaign against guns. If we just blindly followed the
      4 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • The constitution is the supreme law of the land
      4 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • The right to bear arms is specifically there so the public can defend themselves from the government trying to take their rights. Just look at Hong kong
      6 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • We have a presidential oath breaker now
      Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Me when liberal threaten to take my guns:”you’ve yeed your last haw”
      6 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • None of the firearms I own are registered because it's not their fucking business what I own
      4 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Given the majority of the armed forces would not take up arms against their friends and family for the sake of one politicians misplaced ideals, it would be basically the masses vs a handful of politicians and their private security detail
      3 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • All it’s gonna take is them walking up to some porch-smoking, seven kid having, old fastioned, twice divorced, trailer dwelling, honest to god redneck and they’ll realize guns aren’t going without a fight
      5 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • 5 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • An most states it's already illegal to own a full auto rifle
      3 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Gun Owner: Hey leave me alone. Congressperson: Hey give us your guns! Gun Owner: No, and I’ll defend myself against Government tyranny if I have to! Congressperson: Why are you threatening me???!!!
      6 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • 4 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • 4 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • I’m going to Wendy’s. Y’all want anything?
      Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Come take it
      Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Im not for taking guns away... however there is a legal constitutional way to make guns illegal... the 2nd amendment can be repealed just like the 18th amendment.
      Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • New rule: illegal immigrants can’t just say “we want to get in because we have kids” either they follow the laws or don’t come in
      Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • *malfeasence
      Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Molon Labe.
      Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Have y’all seen what happened in China? Take away the people’s means of defending against themselves against the government and the government then tries and takes more liberties away from the people and then is forced into a civil war of the people vs the government
      Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • I should be able to own a tank if I want. My rights shall not be infringed motherfucker
      Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • I commented a while back on a similar post on the whole “AK-47 or AR-15” thing. I know they’re very common guns, but if that’s as far as your horizons expand with no ACTUAL knowledge other than what second rate online news articles say, then you shouldn’t be opposing what you don’t understand.
      Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • I mean isn’t “law abiding” the exact opposite point of the second amendment? Like it’s there to brap the govt
      Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • S h oo t h i s a s s
      Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • It's great learning about yhe government and how it works cause I can come on iFunny, go to the comments, and laugh my ass off at how stupid people sound when they try to say the government works in one way, but it actually works in the opposite way
      Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Are we just gonna ignore the fact that any law that directly goes against the constitution is null and void which means they would be trying to enforce an unconstitutional law therefore they are the criminals
      Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Also gun nuts need to calm down, no legislation has been proposed, considered, or given any real.attetnion by anyone that argues all guns should go in america. There was an assault weapons ban in this country 20 yrs ago, it was good. That's basically what we want back. Pretty reasonable
      Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • 2nd one should be true tho
      Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • THIS ! ! !
      Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Ah yes. Take the guns from the law abiding citizens and leave the criminals armed
      Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • The laws of man are insignificant to the laws of God
      Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • It was just the other day when there was a feature where all the comments said “if you get arrested for drugs, your by definition a criminal, regardless of justness of the law” i’m sure that 90% of those people still liked this post though
      Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • I would turn against the gubment to protect my freedom
      Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • That’s the whole point of the second amendment is to protect ourselfs from a corrupt govt
      Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Gun owners are really dumb
      Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • It's MALfeasance
      Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • These people say AK-47 as if the civ version’s still an automatic weapon.
      Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • What’s with all this pro republican shit everywhere, we all know they’re radicals who want to suppress those who disagree with them, hence why they want firearms.
      Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Constitution can be changed but okay boomer lmao
      Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • "Are you really gonna die for a magazine?"...."Someone will"
      Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • stop calling confiscation "mandatory buyback"
      Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED. FUCK ANYONE WHO THINKS OTHERWISE.
      Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • noon don’t understand that amendments exist lmao
      Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • I'm usually down for debate and politics but come on, this is a iFunny... Less gun debate more cat videos
      Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Get rid of guns you start a new revolution
      Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Just because something is a law doesn’t mean it’s right. Slavery used to be law, wasn’t right; You wanting to take away the law abiding guns isn’t right either and will be ignored.
      Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Law abiding as in following the law to not murder people with no excuse
      Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Constitution can be amended just saying
      Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • New Rule: The Constitution shalt not be questioned. Discuss.
      Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Fuck the law. How about a constitution abiding citizen then? Better?
      Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • When politicians think that law abiding gun owner means abiding my their laws over natural laws preceding government...
      Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Dang both are good arguments
      Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Come and get it
      Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • *looks at Hong Kong* nah. Come and take em
      Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • I want this civil war to start. This time it's the people against the government instead of the people vs the people
      Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • And that’s why trump is going through impeachment
      Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • I mean they're called Amendments for a reason..
      Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • i thought republicans hated mexicans because they were all criminals but now they want to be criminals? you guys couldnt stick to a script if you tried
      Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Over my dead body
      Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Gun are part of my religion
      Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Law abiding gun owners have the ability to be lawfully in the eyes of our human rights and constitution. The constitution plainly states if a goverment says we cant do what the constitution says then that goverment is no longer legit in her power.
      Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • I hope they realise the vast majority of military members and law enforcement personnel are gun owners and wont support a gun ban. You cant enforce a law without people to enforce it.
      Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show

iFunny plug-in will teach your phone to smile

get on the iFunny app to roast them

All content related issues will be solved right here.
After all necessary information is provided, of course:

Complete the form below to notify iFunny of a claim relating to your intellectual property rights and content or some technical inconvenience with the service.
(Positive and productive feedback is appreciated as well).

Your details

Your relationships to the rights holder

Type of claim

Select
Copyright Trademark Nazi-related Offensive Technical difficulties Other
Describe the issue in detail. Please be specific.
Feeling poetic today? Feel free to provide more information
By clicking on "Submit" below, you are certifying the following statements:
  • I state that I have a good faith belief that use of the work(s) in the manner complained of is not authorized by the copyright owner, its agent, or the law.
  • I state that the information in this notification is accurate and, under penalty of perjury, that I am the owner of the exclusive right that is allegedly infringed, or an authorized agent for the owner.
  • I give my permission to pass my contact information to the alleged infringing party.