• {{ formattedCount }}  {{ count > 1 ? 'comments' : 'comment' }}

    • What if it’s outlawed by the Geneva convention
      3.8K
      {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • That is one fine ass tiger not going to lie looks like it was in Africa
      3.2K
      {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • BUSHWAKKA 20 apr
      15
      {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • content not available more
      11
      {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Honestly if our government can have it we should too
      15607 21 apr
      10
      {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • If the government can have it we should be able to have it. The whole reason for the second amendment is to protect us from the government
      9
      {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Having weapons banned by the government and having them confiscated even though you haven’t planned on doing anything bad- is the exact same as being charged with “thought crime”-change my mind.
      9
      {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Owning an armory capable of taking over a small country should be perfectly legal under the second amendment change my mind
      Cancerous 20 apr
      9
      {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • A government that does not trust its citizens with firearms is a government that is not to be trusted.
      ZJD1993 20 apr
      9
      {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • This is such a dumb question. Of course we should have access to it. If the military can have it, so to should the people. Learn how to read the Second people.
      Lunchy306 22 apr
      9
      {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Well technically the U.S. Constitution does give us the right to own the same weapons as our military, so...
      8
      {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • 8
      {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Tanks are actually legal and the cheaper ones come at around $40K, you just can’t do anything illegal with the take like have it loaded or disobey traffic laws. Still, owning a tank isn’t illegal
      7
      {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Couldn’t agree more! The right to bear arms is the right to arm yourself against a tyrannical government meaning that we need to be armed as they are.
      Jcpuddles 23 apr
      6
      {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • If i wanted a tank and had money for one nobody should stop me from owning one
      6
      {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • The 2nd amendment is meant to keep the government and the people equal and I fail to see how "nobody needs an AR-15" when the government has missles that can level a building from 20 miles away
      6
      {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
      paytent 21 apr
      6
      {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • I should be allowed to own anything my government has
      Vetchi 20 apr
      6
      {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • How the fuck you gonna fight a tyrannical government without stuff like
      payronny 20 apr
      6
      {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • How else are we supposed to exercise our constitutional right of overthrowing the government?
      AURAXXUR 20 apr
      6
      {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • 6
      {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED!
      _WAR 20 apr
      6
      {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Back when the 2nd amendment was written, as a civilian, you were allowed to buy cannons for your ship... you’re goddamn right we should be allowed to buy tanks.. and you can. You can legally own a tank and with the right paperwork, explosive shells. God bless America.
      Matt_Man 20 apr
      6
      {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • You can argue about gun laws until the apocalypse rolls around, but there is simply one undeniable fact, like it or not the civilian populace is always going to possess firearms, legal or not.
      6
      {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • I need my medicinal A-10 warthog
      6
      {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Keep the government in check
      5
      {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Constitution of United States of America 1789 (rev. 1992) A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
      5
      {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • The second amendment basically states the government cannot infringe on our right to have arms. This applies to all armaments without restrictions. The government doesn't give us this right, but they are required to protect it. Any law restricting it is illegitimate.
      5
      {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • 5
      {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • If you can somehow get access to it and afford it he’ll yea
      5
      {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Nukes and explosives aren’t arms unless they’re home made from scratch and not used for terrorist purposes . I fully support owning ar-15, shotguns and all such.
      jmorsay 20 apr
      5
      {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • We should have what the military has. That’s why we have the 2nd amendment
      024ajnag 20 apr
      5
      {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • People can buy tanks. I've actually looked into it.
      5
      {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Tanks should be ok planes/jets are ok. Nukes wouldn't be necessary because the us wouldn't nuke itself if there was a rebellion so the rebels wouldn't need nukes either. The second amendment was ment for the people to stop a tyrannical government so the people should have access to the same weaponry
      5
      {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • If someone can afford a tank let them buy a fucking tank
      5
      {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Every gun law IS an infringement. I have the right to bear arms mother fuckers. SHALL NOT HE INFRINGED!
      Fast_Mag 20 apr
      5
      {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • What’s more dangerous, a room full of people and 1 person has a gun? Or a room full of people and everyone has a gun?
      6
      {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • "The government cant be trusted! Bad cops! Bad trump! Bad Brett Cavanaugh! Bad pence! Theres a lot of bad in the government!" "Heehoo, give up your guns to the gubment!"
      5
      {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Jets and tanks: yes. Nukes: the military can not use it, therefore the population can not.
      5
      {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Yes to everything but nukes. Nukes are the only thing listed there that pose an eminent threat to other people due to their habit of causing radiation contamination in a wide swath of land. Tanks and Jets could be bought and tracked via a registry like states do with cars.
      5
      {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • 5
      {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • "A WELL REGULATED Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
      5
      {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • 5
      {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Legalize recreational nukes
      5
      {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • If you can afford it, you should be able to own it
      Paroro 20 apr
      5
      {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • The only thing stopping anyone from just buying a jet is there cost.
      4
      {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Anyone else still have their bump stock lol suck my dick ATF
      4
      {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • The point of our right to bear arms was so that the civilians would be on equal ground if they had to fight the government
      4
      {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • I’m fine with no nukes. The rest, let people have them.
      6
      {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • If the government can have it, so should I
      Talos 20 apr
      4
      {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • I make those tanks. Yeah baby 91mike
      4
      {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Oh my favorite gun, a nuke
      Octopope 20 apr
      4
      {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • How am I suppose to fight the government when they have nukes and I don’t?
      Nabed 20 apr
      4
      {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • In America it’s actually very little paperwork to own a functioning tank with a working gun, the hard part is finding one and restoring it to working capacity
      4
      {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • S H A L L N O T B E I N F R I N G E D
      4
      {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Doesn’t matter what they say. Hop in your tank and tell em to fuck off
      4
      {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Unironically I should be able to open carry a fully automatic belt fed light machine gun into my local 7-Eleven and the government shouldn’t be able to do shit about it
      4
      {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Sure, if the dude can afford one. You can legally buy a supersonic nuclear bomber- some British design. Obviously you can’t equip the nuclear weapons per global agreements, but you could break the rules if you had the power to do so.Still, automobiles are deadlier than most firearms. Kinetic missile
      4
      {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Do nukes count as an arm you can bear?
      4
      {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • I mean a nuke is a bomb you dumb Fuck
      4
      {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Seeing how the amendment was written to allow us to defend ourselves from the government we should damn well be allowed to by tanks and planes. What are we supposed to destroy tanks and jets with muskets?
      4
      {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • If you can afford jets, tanks and nukes, no amount of legal power was going to stop you anyways.
      4
      {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Chandora 20 apr
      4
      {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • You should be able to buy your own nukes, if they are bought domestically, legally from the government, and can be proven you can adequately store it and garuntee that it won't harm others.
      4
      {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED
      TheRev001 20 apr
      4
      {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • You should be able to own it, if the government becomes corrupt I’m going over his house
      Connor302 23 apr
      3
      {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • What do any of those have to do with guns?
      3
      {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Nukes aren't guns, nor are jets. We also have laws on owning jets. Gotta have papers and a license.
      3
      {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • If you can buy it, you should be able to own it. Fuck the system
      Valphaus 22 apr
      4
      {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • If I could own a tank, you bet your ass I would.
      Cypherus 21 apr
      3
      {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • If the government has it so should we. If we can't they'll just push us around.
      HJMayland 21 apr
      3
      {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • If it’s made by people ... people should use it ... even if it’s over the top
      3
      {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • I think everyone should not only have access to jets, tanks and nukes but also jet-powered tanks that fire nukes
      Neger 21 apr
      3
      {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Smh I hate when people are all progun bc of the 2nd amendment. The founding father clearly meant that they wanted Americans to have the arms of bears to overthrow tyrannical governments. Fucking conservatives
      3
      {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • I have no actual use for a tank, but if I could afford it, i should fucking be able to buy a tank if i wanted to.
      VirginKun 21 apr
      3
      {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • 3
      {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Knock knock freedom bitch
      3
      {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Nukes should be illegal in general. But Tanks and Jets are fucking awesome and not to mention if the government turns on us it wont be a fair fight without them
      Wynman 21 apr
      3
      {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Do people not realize how much a tank or a jet is because if you save up to buy one and load it to the teeth..... you deserve to keep it
      3
      {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Hallimar 21 apr
      3
      {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • You can already own jets and tanks
      3
      {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • A tank is just a vehicle with a very big gun strapped onto it. The gun at least is protected. Same with jets. Nukes are not guns or arms, they are WMD's.
      3
      {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • It's almost like guns and nukes are different things. That being said, there's nothing wrong with owning a disarmed tank or fighter jet. That's dope.
      _YoRHa_ 20 apr
      3
      {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Fuck the libs
      3
      {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • It’s not illegal to own a tank in the US, just hard to get the munitions
      3
      {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • My dream is to own an f22, just for flying it normal like I would my Cessna. but because y’all pussy ass liberals, even if I had that kind of money I can’t buy cool shit like thay😤
      3
      {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Grunhold 20 apr
      3
      {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • If I ever have enough money to buy an Abrams tank then I should definitely be able to buy one
      Alnico 20 apr
      3
      {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Such a strawman: Laws are an infringement “Fuck lets just give everyone nukes and mustard gas then since that is what you want”
      4
      {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • We already have access to Jets and tanks
      3
      {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Legally, Americans are permitted by their Second Amendment Rights to own “military-grade weaponry” (obviously paraphrased) so by TECHNICALITY we are allowed to own tanks, jets, etc. Doesn’t mean the government will let us though.
      3
      {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • My medicinal A1 Abrams tank
      Iw8t4no1 20 apr
      3
      {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Fuck you im keeping my nuclear war heads
      3
      {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • 3
      {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • It's totally legal to own a tank. You just can't have the shells for it
      Noz20 20 apr
      3
      {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Fuck yea man if my enemy has it i have to have it
      3
      {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • If the military can have it I can have it. That is quite literally what the founding fathers envisioned and that is how it should always be
      4
      {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • The government must want 1776 to happen all over again. KILL AS MANY PIGS AS POSSIBLE WHEN THAT TIME COMES, SPARE NONE!!!
      3
      {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • IF. THE. GOVERNMENT. HAS. IT. WHY. CANT. I.
      3
      {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • The second amendment only protects the existing natural born human right to bear arms. The second amendment is not a right allotted to the people it is merely a protection of their right.
      Aviatou 20 apr
      3
      {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show

iFunny plug-in will teach your phone to smile

get on the iFunny app to roast them

All content related issues will be solved right here.
After all necessary information is provided, of course:

Complete the form below to notify iFunny of a claim relating to your intellectual property rights and content or some technical inconvenience with the service.
(Positive and productive feedback is appreciated as well).

Your details

Your relationships to the rights holder

Type of claim

Select
Copyright Trademark Nazi-related Offensive Technical difficulties Other
Describe the issue in detail. Please be specific.
Feeling poetic today? Feel free to provide more information
By clicking on "Submit" below, you are certifying the following statements:
  • I state that I have a good faith belief that use of the work(s) in the manner complained of is not authorized by the copyright owner, its agent, or the law.
  • I state that the information in this notification is accurate and, under penalty of perjury, that I am the owner of the exclusive right that is allegedly infringed, or an authorized agent for the owner.
  • I give my permission to pass my contact information to the alleged infringing party.