• 202 comments

    • 1.5K 98
    • If this legit doesnt get liked once i will turn jewish and circumcise evry baby at the hospital with out the parents permission
      1.7K 65
    • For those who don't understand peta tweeted this
      5
    • I’m surprised their game is just now getting this kind of attention
      5 1
    • No they only sue their fans and washed up rappers lol
      4
    • It was a parody, its legal
      4
    • PETA's Pokémon parody was created a while ago. Nintendo didnt care then, they certainly don't care now.
      JoseI64 22d
      4 1
    • I mean fuck they sued two kids for singing the Pokémon theme song and putting it on YouTube (Smosh).
      4
    • Nintendo sues people for dumbass shit all the time but the second people actually want it to happen they suddenly become wimpy doormats.
      3
    • I don’t get it can someone plz explain
      3 1
    • PETA made multiple games bashing Nintendo using their characters years and years ago. If they were going to do something, it would’ve been back then. Not now.
      3 1
    • I’m sorry but peta technically should have been shut down a long ass time ago. They technically have been doing both animal abuse and animal murder without the right to (I’m talking about when they killed random dogs for no reason when it wasn’t there right to make the decision to do that)
      3 1
    • I feel like they would have already sued by now if they were gonna sue considering peta’s game game out in 2012 and was already controversial back then.
      3 3
    • They already did when those peta games first came out. PETA abused a loophole by claiming that they were parody games
      3 2
    • Peta can't be sued for that byn Nintendo as the game is a social commentary on Pokemon it's legally a parody
      3 2
    • *says something that makes Peta look even worse to get top comment
      3
    • What's the beef between Nintendo and peta?
      2 1
    • It’s a parody, they didnt do anything legally wrong because it’s not using any source code
      Naess 22d
      2 8
    • Why nintendo?
      2 1
    • They're too busy dealing with Soulja Boy
      2
    • What did peta do this time?
      2 3
    • At the end of the day, you petty fucks don’t know how a business nor HYPOCRISY works. if they sue PETA they also have to sue ALL the 12 year olds who made Pokemon flash games. Nintendo is a billion dollar company, they don’t. Have. The time.
      2 2
    • Ariana Grande Needs to perform at the PETA headquarters
      2
    • It’s a parody under fair use, Nintendo can’t do anything about it
      Anankos 22d
      2
    • They can’t it’s parody art and therefore perfectly legal
      2 1
    • They can’t, it’s a parody. Nintendo LOVES suing people but this is the one thing they can’t. They’ve already tried.
      2
    • On what grounds?
      2 1
    • Protected under copyright law Bc it’s a parody
      Vesiris 23d
      2
    • Can someone make a go fund me for this
      2
    • Wait? Was the Pokemon parody actually real?
      2 2
    • Make them pay
      iRaditz 23d
      3
    • Ugg Ugg PETA Bad Ugg Ugg I’m Casey Neistat
      2
    • That parody is like 9 years old, if they were going to take action it would've been a long time ago
      1
    • The one time we want Nintendo to sue and they just sitting around like "Huh? Whuh? Who?"
      1
    • They would’ve done it like 5 years ago when the game came out.
      N4Z31R 21d
      1
    • If they're gonna sue Pokemon Uranium they should sue this
      1
    • It's a parody. It hurts to say it, but it's legal.
      1 2
    • the reason that nintendo hasn’t sued is because this game has been around for years and they don’t make a profit from it directly and due to copyright law Nin can’t sue for it since it falls under fair use. It sucks but that’s how the law works kids.
      1
    • The one time we want Nintendo to Sue.
      1
    • Didn't they already try a few years back and lost miserably because it's a parody?
      dogfucc 22d
      1 1
    • Dude McDonald's has to sue them too, they made a Pokémon black and blue two and used the Ronald McDonald gang
      1 2
    • They are them
      1
    • They can't sue it's a parody
      1 5
    • If they sued soulja boy but not peta we gotta boycott
      C0OP 22d
      1
    • I pretty sure they did twice
      1
    • They only sue the good ones
      1
    • Pocket monsters
      1
    • Unfortunately parody law protects them.
      1 1
    • Guys the game peta made has been out way before the announcement of sword and shield and they did sue them they’re just under parody law or something
      1
    • I don’t think they will because they would have done it a long time ago
      1
    • Peta even though I hated both before and after Steve Irwin, OS covered under copy write law was parody. So Nintendo probably won't do anything
      kooger 22d
      1
    • Parody and fair use bruv. Unfortunately they can't
      1 1
    • PETA, people who euthanize treatable animals
      Psalm 22d
      1
    • Heeeh
      1
    • They’re too nice
      1 3
    • Looks like a dick.. lmao
      1
    • They sued roblox
      1 1
    • If they could've sued them they would have years ago, when that shitty game came out
      dreziv 23d
      1 3
    • If they win the lawsuit, peta gets fucked. If they lose the lawsuit we can try to get rom hacks back
      1 1
    • Sadly guys they can’t sue Peta; fair use laws.
      1 1
    • Niggas sue everyone but they left PETA alone
      1
    • Nintendo would only sue for defamation, otherwise they would've sued when the parody came out over 6 years ago.
      Jon171 23d
      1
    • It happened to soljaboi
      1
    • Lol
      1
    • They CANT because it's a PARODY
      1 1
    • So many loving fan games in good faith, and this propogandic bullshit gets a pass? I don’t think so.
      Ruplo 23d
      1
    • They can't sue them, unfortunately. Pokemon Black & Blue is technically a parody, which falls under the Fair Use category.
      1 3
    • Assault 23d
      1
    • Do it
      1
    • I hate to stick up for PETA here, but parody is fair use.
      4 4
    • I'm early
      1
    • Pleeeease JUST DO IT
      1
    • Do it.
      1
    • Peta very bad bad
      vaydor 23d
      1
    • God I miss white ninja comics. I used to read them after school
      1
    • Nintendo won’t drop to pita’s level. Nintendo doesn’t grovel in the mud
      3
    • I suspect that its fair use, but I’m not certain about the legal details
      Karrde 22d
      1 4
    • The reason they aren’t suing is because if they lose they could lose the rights to pokemon like so people can see
      5
    • Nintendo needs to make a PETA parody that shows actual stats on how many animals they euthanize yearly
      Zeke12 22d
      1 3
    • They get Soulja boi but they won’t go after PETA?
      Titan70 22d
    • They sued soulja boy
    • Sue them for what?
      1
    • Nintendo is afraid of the leftist backlash, therefore we must team up with Nintendo and sue PETA’s ass all at once.
      1 2
    • THEY CAN'T SUE PETA FOR MAKING A PARODY, DO Y'ALL REALLY NOT UNDERSTAND COPYWRITE LAWS
      1 5
    • Pokemon black and blue came out years ago, if nintendo were to sue them over it, they already would have.
      _Cinn_ 23d
      1 4
    • I don't get it
      2 3
    • Why would they sue?
      1 10
    • They rather sue there fans
      1
    • Sorry but PETA didn’t do anything illegal against Nintendo
      1
  • Show more comments

iFunny plug-in will teach your phone to smile

get on the iFunny app to roast them

All content related issues will be solved right here.
After all necessary information is provided, of course:

Complete the form below to notify iFunny of a claim relating to your intellectual property rights and content or some technical inconvenience with the service.
(Positive and productive feedback is appreciated as well).

Your details

Your relationships to the rights holder

Type of claim

Select
Copyright Trademark Nazi-related Offensive Technical difficulties Other
Describe the issue in detail. Please be specific.
Feeling poetic today? Feel free to provide more information
By clicking on "Submit" below, you are certifying the following statements:
  • I state that I have a good faith belief that use of the work(s) in the manner complained of is not authorized by the copyright owner, its agent, or the law.
  • I state that the information in this notification is accurate and, under penalty of perjury, that I am the owner of the exclusive right that is allegedly infringed, or an authorized agent for the owner.
  • I give my permission to pass my contact information to the alleged infringing party.