Actually most of that if false lol.
Private companies that have anything to do with social media have to answer to the people. And in my opinion. The first amendment. Oh and by the way. A lot of Christians DONT agree with the baker refusing service outright at first. however. Because they became...
Belligerent and rude they had every right to refuse service. Also.
The patriot act actually LIMITS the government a bit too and protects our information unless they have a warrant. So this bitch is stupid 3 times. Biased cunt.
Q You literally just gave a perfect example of why they can refuse service. Trumpers were the equivalent of screaming and being belligerent. So you are saying that you want to force a company to do business with everyone even if they violate your terms?
You literally missed the main point of my comment. There's a difference. Something like social media has different laws and should be help accountable by different
It actually doesn't. Still a private business that can control if they limit service for violating terms. Are you saying that private businesses should be forced to serve people who come into the store and start screaming disturbing customers?
You.. still aren't getting my point Imfao. Social media companies in particular
NEED to have a different set of laws and rules in place than other regular companies. YouTube,
Facebook, Instagram, snapchat etc. Should NOT have that much to silence the free speech of the people because their plat-
Forms are some of the
ONLY viable ways of getting voices heard. And I believe it goes against the
1'st amendment in that way.
So you want to force them to not remove misinformation that's proven false and not remove people when they incite violence? You realize by doing this you are opening the door to forcing any business to serve people that violate their terms of service. You cannot apply different
You literally have to apply different rules though. They're a different type of company. Just like gas companies will not have the same laws as internet companies. Etc.
And literally they've been removing right wing anything slowly just because they don't like it. (Let's take pogchamp for example)
reply to anonplaguedoc
    • EmailPinterestRedditTumblr Report
    • Copy link
    • Pinterest

iFunny plug-in will teach your phone to smile

get on the iFunny app to roast them

All content related issues will be solved right here.
After all necessary information is provided, of course:

Complete the form below to notify iFunny of a claim relating to your intellectual property rights and content or some technical inconvenience with the service.
(Positive and productive feedback is appreciated as well).

Your details

Your relationships to the rights holder

Type of claim

Copyright Trademark Nazi-related Offensive Technical difficulties Other
Describe the issue in detail. Please be specific.
Feeling poetic today? Feel free to provide more information
By clicking on "Submit" below, you are certifying the following statements:
  • I state that I have a good faith belief that use of the work(s) in the manner complained of is not authorized by the copyright owner, its agent, or the law.
  • I state that the information in this notification is accurate and, under penalty of perjury, that I am the owner of the exclusive right that is allegedly infringed, or an authorized agent for the owner.
  • I give my permission to pass my contact information to the alleged infringing party.

Privacy notice

For a list of the categories of personal information that we collect from you and how we use that information, please review iFunny’s privacy policy