• EmailPinterestRedditTumblr Report
    • Copy link
    • Pinterest
  • 1018 comments

    • All propoganda against nuclear comes from oil and coal companies
      763 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Only downside I see is radiation and if it melts down. But if we got good staff and good equipment then it’s perfect
      400 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Buttt cherybobyly and fukashimaaaaaa dude omg its so dangerous dude!!!1!
      603 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Remember last year when everyone was against it on here
      Fricked 4 oct
      127 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • I would but I have a theme to keep
      58 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • All of the disposal sites have leaked at least once, leading to major ecological damage
      10 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • France already been on that wave soon
      11 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Nuclear energy isn't sustainable for planet wide use, the amount of available uranium isn't enough and thorium still needs uranium to function. Otherwise yeah its a good energy source.
      6 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • SMRs are the future of Nuclear Energy.
      7 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • >more good than harm no shit, the only harm comes from when retards build one on a fucking fault line, or where you're guaranteed to have a natural disaster
      585 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Literally no downsides
      Riggle 4 oct
      17 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Fukashima, Chernobyl, and Three-Mile Island are the only nuclear incidents in history, and they were all old, uncared for plants
      10 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Absolutely fucking not lmfao
      1 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • I would destroy all modern technology if possible but that will never happen. The best we can do is use nuclear for the military and necessary industry and have mandatory rural living and little electric devices and modern conveniences. We have been made lazy, inactive, dependent, and deprived of
      7 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • I'm writing an essay over nuclear power can any of yall give some general points of pros and cons
      4 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Smug nucleartards refuse to acknowledge the extreme unpopularity of nuclear makes it nearly politically impossible to build reactors today, they take decades to build, cost tens of billions, and we have no permanent waste solution yet, we're currently building a single reactor in the entire US
      6 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Better than oil and coal
      4 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Only if they're built in Utah and Arizona
      Mr_Red 5 oct
      2 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • The system in the US is designed to make it so that nuclear energy can never succeed. It's such bs
      5 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • 2 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Repub if you don’t know anything about nuclear power or any type of power source outside of surface level explanations from other people who also don’t shit about it
      Hoggle 5 oct
      1 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Nuclear power has the most energy per density of matter. Far exceeding coal and wind.
      2 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • name0101
      No, there are no 100 percent reliable coolant sources
      name0101 5 oct
      1 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Orrrrr, what if we all simply reject materialism, and go back to a primal society. Then we wouldnt have to deal with the negatives of fossil fuels nor nuclesr energy
      noon_ 5 oct
      2 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Why cant we just put nuclear waste in space?
      4 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • I’d be 100% for it if we could dispose of the waste properly. One dude made progress recently which was cool. The buildup is dangerous and could be a world scale problem later on if something went wrong.
      3 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Nuclear power is only bad if something goes terribly wrong
      1 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • I never get why eco people are so much against nuclear
      5 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Nuclear power and electric cars. Mass implementation of these and we can fix so many of our problems
      3 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • 10 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • "Buh buh muh Chernobyl" yea im sure being a soviet satellite state with 0 resources and proper trained staff yea meltdowns are gonna happen
      2 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Thorium>>>>>uranium
      1 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Why do you retards insist on treating people like their stupid for rightfully being afraid of getting baked like a potato from radiation
      Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Second cleanest energy source, even cleaner than solar
      1 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • People need to actually look into nuclear power. They hear the words Nuclear and Radiation and they get spooked thinking it’s a warhead
      3 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • I want a nuclear future, fusion powered cars, butler robots, and computers that can fit on your arm
      2 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • The only risk for investors is literally regulation changes that happen all the time. 90% of the reason most plants shut down is because its too expensive to overhaul the plant and the capital would be better used in other energy sectors. :( I love nuclear but its getting fucked by the government.
      2 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Yeah but imagine if a war happened
      KDUDE996 5 oct
      Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Can we use helium 3 on the moon as a nuclear power source? I heard it doesn't leave behind very much radioactive waste
      1 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • oil and gas want you scared
      1 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Every time we get close to actually using it, some jackoff makes another Chernobyl documentary and puts us back at square 1.
      banjo34 5 oct
      3 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Legit more safe than coal and oil and produces minimal waste
      2 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • How many chernobyl's and fukushima's do we need to teach you this lesson old man?
      Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Puts on my PIP BOY! (fallout) and my vault guy shirt dude I'm ready...
      Lucerne 5 oct
      3 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Especially when run with thorium fuel cores instead of uranium ones. They produce even more power, are extremely cheap to maintain and are far less dangerous.
      2 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • It's all fun and games until everyone gets cancer.
      Doritoh 5 oct
      Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Nuclear till science catches up with geothermal, hydro, and solar. Solar is the future tho
      Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Remember that scare in the 70s with TMI? That was fun.
      Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Thorium > anything else
      Chair_ 5 oct
      2 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • I support big dick energy. They can create an utopian society
      1 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • I support nuclear but I want wind and solar more because they produce less harmful waste than nuclear. But still, fuck them natural gas and oil simps
      Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • I support NO power
      Momgols 5 oct
      2 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Maybe not main, but certainly a major part of it
      2 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Make sure they use molten salt too
      1 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • I can count the problems with nuclear power on on hand. All 20 fingers
      SeaRogue 5 oct
      2 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Support nuclear energy to accelerate the collapse
      Cajun 5 oct
      1 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • i’ve always been a bit skeptical of nuclear power because of one thing: where does all of the nuclear waste go? it takes tens of thousands of years to decompose and there’s only so much room to put it. launching it into space would be inefficient and way too expensive.
      Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Fuck yea Thorium
      1 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • You have to think about the build up of nuclear waste. It can be easily recycled, but humans are lazy. Let's say worldwide, that 99% of countries, cities, territories, etc all recycle their waste. That one percent can build up many tonnes of nuclear waste every year.
      Lillou 5 oct
      Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Nuclear power made me shit myself
      1 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • no power, Kaczynski Electrics
      1 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Why can't we just launch nuclear waste into space? Build a space elevator and dump it on the moon or some shit.
      Spinelli 4 oct
      1 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • The chyrebol plant that melted? The Russians should have shown that nuclear power isnt something a jist fuck around with man ww2 should of shown that.
      1 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Yeah, but where are you gonna put the waste?
      2 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • The power plant next to my town is being shut down for being understaffed.
      Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • The only reason nuclear energy has had its problems is because liberals are sabotaging our power plants
      4 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Isnt it like super renewable? I really dont wanna have our planet eventually go to another stone age cause we ran our planet dry
      2 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • But they’ll keep pushing how bad it is cus it can singlehandedly take down all major energy companies
      3 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • I do support clean and renewables like solar and wind and hydro, as they are exponentially getting cheaper, but realistically they will NEVER be able to replace fossil fuels in time. They should augment power more or less since they can go in areas nuclear usually can’t go in.
      Krona 5 oct
      1 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Nah, Uranium’s too finite. Slavery is far more efficient.
      1 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • first off, i want nothing but the complete destruction of the big oil and coal industry. heres one problem tho, if one dude fucks up it has a potential to be a natural disaster. or in a scenario where a plant is abandoned for more than a day, then a natural disaster would also occur.
      valvo 5 oct
      1 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • “B-B-BUT CHERNOBYL!!!! MUH THREE MILE ISLAND!!1!1!!!” Shut the fuck up retard. Nuclear is the future
      Hernia 5 oct
      7 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Inb4 retards who’ve watched a single youtube video and don’t actually know anytging about nuclear comment “duhh thorium reactor!”
      Warthicc 5 oct
      2 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Better than going full solar wind and water
      Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • It can be good but when it goes bad it’s bad
      Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • The government should be all over this, it'll give them more depleted uranium
      Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • um... but world war 2? case closed karen
      Recon 5 oct
      Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • “Durrr but muh Chernobyl!!!11!1!” Chernobyl was a jewish conspiracy to discredit nuclear power. It never happened
      Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • I work in nuclear power and let me tell you I hate my fucking life
      Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Honestly I feel like starting a revolution in South America, free some land, become our own nation, and then become more free than America. (And yes I'll us nuclear fusion as energy).
      1 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • I'm thinking about goin for nuclear engineering, fuckin pansies that oppose it pisses me tf off
      Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • B-but the simpsons say nuclear bad!
      Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Fuck Big Oil
      Shoreg 5 oct
      Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Ugly
      Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • from illinois, everyone has cancer there
      flonp 5 oct
      Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • It is a main power source, can't virtue signal energy or the power gets cut off
      Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • The future is Nuclear, Geothermal, Hydroelectric, Wind, and Solar
      Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Nuclear is a very good stepping stone. It should be used to get us to being on all green and renewable energy and then phased out.
      Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Best power
      Warthicc 5 oct
      Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Only reason people think nuclear is evil is because of the hippies in the 70s portrayed it as so and so did television such as simpsons
      MENAClNG 5 oct
      Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Only thing I’d say against nuclear power is that waste has the potential to be mishandled but that’s it. There’s also huge potential in fusion energy like the ITER project.
      1 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Sure, free the energy sector and let people choose what forms of energy are most conducive to their needs. No doubt, there is tremendous room for advancement in nuclear, which is stuck in the 70s. But forcing nuclear would be almost as destructive as forcing unreliables like solar and wind.
      Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • We definitely should use more nuclear power. It is without question better for the environment than fossil fuels when the waste is properly taken care of
      Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Literally as safe as modern renewables (per TWh) and safer than all nonrenewable s. Also takes less land and resources. Plus, if we harness fusion, the only byproduct is helium gas
      Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • The only harm it does it taking up comical amounts of land to construct lakes to cool the plants core.
      Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Chernobyl part 2
      Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Nuclear doesn't cause any harm so long as your plant isn't a Soviet experiment on how few safety precautions you can put in place before you irradiated half of Europe
      BADGER 5 oct
      Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • As long as it’s well maintained it’s the best option in power, if it’s not well maintained it causes some of the worst deviation in history
      1 Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • Omg if you could please PLEASE convince the conservatives in NC to support it. Old assholes dont want to fucking support nuclear even though Duke energy litterally spills coal ash I to our rivers
      Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • 100% of nuclear power opposition is due to the HBO chernobyl special
      Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • i wouod but i dont repub unless its rates or a tournament
      Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show
    • What could possibly go wrong
      Copy FacebookPinterestTwitterEmail {{ shortRepliesCount }}
      Show

iFunny plug-in will teach your phone to smile

get on the iFunny app to roast them

All content related issues will be solved right here.
After all necessary information is provided, of course:

Complete the form below to notify iFunny of a claim relating to your intellectual property rights and content or some technical inconvenience with the service.
(Positive and productive feedback is appreciated as well).

Your details

Your relationships to the rights holder

Type of claim

Select
Copyright Trademark Nazi-related Offensive Technical difficulties Other
Describe the issue in detail. Please be specific.
Feeling poetic today? Feel free to provide more information
By clicking on "Submit" below, you are certifying the following statements:
  • I state that I have a good faith belief that use of the work(s) in the manner complained of is not authorized by the copyright owner, its agent, or the law.
  • I state that the information in this notification is accurate and, under penalty of perjury, that I am the owner of the exclusive right that is allegedly infringed, or an authorized agent for the owner.
  • I give my permission to pass my contact information to the alleged infringing party.

Privacy notice

For a list of the categories of personal information that we collect from you and how we use that information, please review iFunny’s privacy policy